THE LAST SUPPER
Be Sure to scroll all the way down and sideways to see the entire page.

www.john33.com
Painting By...
DOMENICO GHIRLANDAIO
(b. 1449, Firenze, d. 1494, Firenze)
The Artist Who Painted The Last Supper Lived and Worked Before DaVinci.
(I had to leave the painting large to see the details to which I refer)

The artist depicts three women in his work... notice the cat. Was there something in ancient scriptures that caused the artist to include a cat? The following link takes you to a page taken from a book of the apocrypha which was written about Jesus and HIS care for a homeless kitten. www.john33.com/excerpts-from-the-gos-12.htm

*Jewish law required all men to wear beards. In this painting there are three people that do not have beards. They are also feminine appearing, obviously women. Does this mean that three of the 12 disciples were women? Of course not! This was simply the artist's depiction of the last supper - The same as DaVinci's painting - the only difference? The author Dan Brown and his bunch are only out to make money and mislead many people with The DaVinci Code.

* The woman next to Christ looks to be sad, she has her head down on the table, Jesus looks to be caring for her.

* The men seem to be angry or disgusted as they seem to stare at her. It is written that the disciples were jealous of Mary Magdalene and resented her. This seems to be obvious in the painting.

* The passover feast is celebrated by all family members. Wives and children would have been expected. I know Peter was married. I don't know how many (if any) of the other disciples were married. If Jesus had a child, where is the child? Even DaVinci's painting did not include children or Peter's wife unless the one beardless person in DaVinci's work was the wife of Peter - the only disciple known to be married. That would solve the question posed by Dan Brown - WOULD IT NOT? Either way it blows the idea that all 12 disciples were depicted in the famous work of art. In fact I would have to say that THE LAST SUPPER paintings are not based on any facts... only the way it was in the mind of the artist.

There are many other paintings of The Last Supper that convey a totally different meaning than what is supposed to be exposed by The DaVinci Code. It was a painting! Nothing more! A painting that depicts the mental image of the event or the instructions by the person(s) who commissioned him to paint it.

* Another little piece of evidence to support the idea that the paintings did not contain critical truths: Why is the one disciple not seated with the rest? There is not a place at the table for him. Is this supposed to be Judas?

* The obvious and probably silly observation - How did they get behind the table? There is no break in the table??? Another bit of truth that proves theses paintings are not based in a deep, mysterious code or clue. They are just paintings depicting the opinion of the artist or whomever commissioned them to paint the event.

Ask yourself why DaVinci's painting is so well known, on which many religious theories based? I think I know but I will leave that to the reader to decide.

Your Friend,

John

P.S. There are hundreds of interesting paintings of this event - soon I will have a page of links to them.

 

Ghirlandaio's Biography...

Ghirlandaio (also spelled Ghirlandaio, original name Domenico di Tommaso Bigordi) was an early Renaissance painter of the Florentine school noted for his detailed narrative frescoes, which include many portraits of leading citizens in contemporary dress.

Domenico was the son of a goldsmith, and his nickname "Ghirlandaio" was derived from his father's skill in making garlands. Domenico probably began as an apprentice in his father's shop, but almost nothing is known about his training as a painter or the beginnings of his career. The earliest works attributed to him, dating from the early 1470s, show strong influence from the frescoes of Andrea del Castagno, who died when Ghirlandaio was about eight years old. Giorgio Vasari, the biographer of Renaissance artists, recorded in his Lives (1550) that Ghirlandaio was a pupil of the Florentine painter Alesso Baldovinetti, but Baldovinetti was only four or five years older than Ghirlandaio himself. He worked in fresco on large wall surfaces in preference to smaller scale paintings executed on wood panels, although he used them for the altarpieces that were the centrepieces of the fresco cycles in his major undertakings. He never experimented with oil painting, although most Florentine painters of his generation began to use it exclusively in the last quarter of the 15th century.

The village church of Cercina, near Florence, has a fresco of three saints, now thought to be Ghirlandaio's earliest work, but there is general agreement that some frescoes in the church of Ognissanti in Florence, almost certainly dating from around 1472-73, show his style at its earliest developed stage. One of them represents the Pietà and depicts several members of the Vespucci family as mourners, thus already introducing Ghirlandaio's characteristic combination of portrait figures in contemporary dress with a specifically religious subject. Something of the passion for minute detail shown by the early Flemish painters can be found in Ghirlandaio's work at this period; his fresco "St. Jerome in His Study," also in Ognissanti and dated 1480, may even be an enlarged version in fresco of an oil painting by the Flemish painter Jan van Eyck, which had found its way to Florence. The St. Jerome fresco is particularly important because it is a companion piece to one of St Augustine by Ghirlandaio's Florentine contemporary Sandro Botticelli; the difference between the two frescoes reveals Ghirlandaio's rather pedestrian and anecdotal style.

Ghirlandaio's first major commissioned works were the two frescoes depicting scenes from the life of St Fina, painted in 1475 in the Chapel of Santa Fina in the Collegiata at San Gimignano, near Florence. Both works derive from Fra Filippo Lippi's slightly earlier fresco cycle in the cathedral at Prato and contain a number of portrait heads arranged, rather stiffly, in the symmetrical type of composition that was to become increasingly identified with Ghirlandaio. Even then he was already employing assistants; in his later works he clearly could only complete large commissions in the comparatively short time allotted by the extensive use of highly trained assistants working simultaneously on different parts of the frescoes.

In 1481-82 Ghirlandaio received an important commission in the Vatican for a fresco, nominally representing the calling of the first Apostles, Peter and Andrew, in the Sistine Chapel. Its style is reminiscent of the frescoes by Masaccio of about 1427, which had been the great innovating works of the early 15th century in Florence but by then must have seemed somewhat old-fashioned. The principal feature of this fresco is the group of portraits of the Florentine colony in Rome, who are represented as witnesses of the biblical event. It has been suggested that the inclusion of these Florentines in a fresco painted for the Vatican had political significance, because the Florentine government had recently accused Pope Sixtus IV of complicity in the conspiracy of the Pazzi, another powerful Tuscan banking family, to murder the leading members of the Florentine Medici family.

Ghirlandaio must have used his stay in Rome to study Roman antiquities at first hand, for many details of triumphal arches, ancient sarcophagi, and similar antique elements occur in his works throughout the rest of his career. A sketchbook filled with drawings of such antiquities (now in El Escorial, near Madrid) seems to be the work of a member of his shop.

Late in his short life, Ghirlandaio and his assistants, including his brothers Davide and Benedetto and his brother-in-law Bastiano Mainardi, produced two major fresco cycles. The earlier, a series of frescoes and an altarpiece painted in tempera, was executed for the Sassetti Chapel in Santa Trinità in Florence. Commissioned by Francesco Sassetti, an agent of the Medici bank, they were painted between about 1482 and 1485. The six main frescoes represent scenes from the life of St. Francis of Assisi, Sassetti's patron saint. Once more, the frescoes contain many details of the buildings and customs of the period - for example, the original front of the church of Santa Trinità itself - and, in particular, there are numerous portraits of members of the Sassetti family shown together with some of the leading members of the Medici family, what may appear to have been a closer intimacy than was actually the case. The altarpiece, dated 1485, contains further evidence of Ghirlandaio's interest in classical antiquity, for it shows the Adoration of the Shepherds with a Roman triumphal arch in the background and a Roman sarcophagus in place of the traditional manger. This painting in tempera has several direct references to contemporary Flemish paintings, especially the enormous altarpiece painted in oil by Hugo van der Goes, which had been commissioned in Flanders by Tommaso Portinari, another agent of the Medici bank, and which arrived in Florence in the late 1470s.

Ghirlandaio's last and greatest fresco cycle was painted for another Medici banker, Giovanni Tornabuoni, and represents scenes from the life of the Virgin and of St. John the Baptist, the patron saint of Florence. Ghirlandaio signed the contract on Sept. 1, 1485, for these large frescoes on the walls of the choir of Santa Maria Novella in Florence. The altarpiece was still incomplete when he died, but his assistants, among whom was probably the boy Michelangelo, had completed the frescoes by about 1490. The front panel of the altarpiece (Alte Pinakothek, Munich) was completed by assistants according to Ghirlandaio's design soon after his death in 1494. Even more than in the Sassetti Chapel these narrative scenes contain a wealth of detail showing patrician interiors and contemporary dress; as a result they are one of the most important sources for current knowledge of the furnishings of a late 15th-century Florentine palace.

The frescoes in Santa Maria Novella are overcrowded with detail, so that the compositions fail to make their full impact. Some of Ghirlandaio's smaller panel paintings, particularly the portrait of Giovanna Tornabuoni (1488), have a simplicity that makes them far more striking than the frescoes of Santa Maria Novella. The portrait representing an old man with a strawberry nose with his grandchild (c. 1480-90; Louvre, Paris) is perhaps Ghirlandaio's finest painting, notable for its tenderness and humanity, as well as a simplicity and directness of handling.

Ghirlandaio never received a major commission from the Medici family or from any other leading patrons. In the late 19th century, however, because of the high degree of realism in his work, he was ranked as a leading Florentine painter of the 15th century. Although during much of the 20th century the greater imaginative power of Botticelli or Filippino Lippi made Ghirlandaio's paintings seem dull, since the 1960s the honesty and truth of his works have brought him back into critical favour.

Ghirlandaio's son, Ridolfo, was also a noted painter. Among his best-known works are a pair representing scenes from the life of St Zenobius (1517; Academy Gallery, Florence).

JOHN 33 HOME PAGE
 
Copyright 2007 WWW.JOHN33.COM